Quebec’s controversial
crow cull sparks outrage

Animal rights activists denounce “fun day” wildlife killing spree

By Georges R. Dupras

March 26,2025

Well, here we go again. The Government of Quebec has sparked controversy by sanctioning a “fun day”, a killing party for hunters. This event, held on Saturday, March 22, 2025, in Pont-Rouge near Quebec City, encouraged participants to shoot as many crows as possible, with recognition awarded to the top marksman.

There has been long-standing opposition by animal advocates to the killing of wildlife for prizes.

Animal advocates have long opposed such wildlife killing contests. The idea that killing should be entertaining is deeply troubling, and Sophie Gallard, director of animal advocacy at the Montreal SPCA, believes that killing for prizes should be banned. These prize-based events should be prohibited, as they extend beyond crows and coyotes to other practices like “Shark Rodeos,” where anglers compete to catch the most sharks, often displaying still-living creatures on boardwalks for public viewing.

Killing should not be fun

While some industries have evolved with changing market demands and societal values, the animal industries often resist such changes, clinging to outdated practices. It’s worth noting that just because an activity is legal and regulated, it doesn’t necessarily mean it’s right. Similarly, the argument of tradition fails to justify morally questionable practices.

As expected, Marc Renaud, President of the Quebec Federation of Hunters and Fishermen, does not favour Sophie Gallard’s reasoning. Marc Renaud believes humane societies exist to prevent cruelty and not manage hunting. From a personal perspective, hunting might be considered an activity, but labelling it a sport is questionable. True sports require willing participants on equal footing, a criterion that activities like bullfighting, cockfighting and dog fighting fail to meet.

‘While some industries have evolved with changing market demands and societal values, the animal industries often resist such changes, clinging to outdated practices.’

Many activities may be legal, but that does not necessarily make them right. Similarly, certain practices may be considered “traditional,” but that does not make them inherently justifiable either. Personally, I view hunting as an activity rather than a sport. For something to qualify as a sport, there must be two equal and willing participants. Activities like bullfighting, cockfighting, and dogfighting fail to meet these criteria.

During the interview, it was suggested that some species should be spared due to their higher intelligence. This raises the question: Do we choose to consume certain animals over others because of cultural biases? In some societies, eating dogs is commonplace and uncontroversial. So, what truly distinguishes eating a dog from eating a cow?

I have always maintained that education is best served through example. I stand against the shooting of crows, irrespective of the location. I am confident that numerous young people attended the crow eradication blood fest, and I am concerned about its influence on them. First-time attendees are likely to become desensitized, and I ponder how this might affect them.

‘When handling an injured or deceased bird, it is always best to exercise caution. Wear gloves and wash your hands frequently.’

It is challenging to teach respect and non-violence through violent means. We must consider the long-term implications of exposing our youth to such events. The juxtaposition of promoting educational values while simultaneously endorsing activities that harm wildlife sends a conflicting message to our children.

As Canadians, we pride ourselves on our commitment to environmental stewardship and compassionate treatment of animals. It behoves us to reflect on whether events like the Crow Fest align with these values. Perhaps we could explore alternative activities that foster a deeper appreciation for nature and wildlife conservation, thereby setting a more positive example for our young people.

In conclusion, we ought to critically examine the educational value of such events and consider more constructive ways to engage our youth in outdoor activities that promote respect for all living creatures.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are those of its author and do not reflect the opinions of WestmountMag.ca, its publishers or editors.

Avian Flu Alert

Avian flu (commonly referred to as bird flu) is caused by influenza type A, a viral infection found in bird species. I want to address the following cautiously, as I do not wish to create unnecessary fear or alarm, but it is better to be safe than sorry. When handling an injured or deceased bird, it is always best to exercise caution. Wear gloves, shark gloves if available, and wash your hands frequently. Avoid touching your face during the process.

Feature image: pen_ash on Unsplash

Other articles by Georges Dupras
Other recent articles