Why modernizing animal
protection laws fail to pass
Canada’s antiquated animal protection laws do not meet today’s changing expectations
By Georges R. Dupras
July 19, 2017
Taken from The Parliamentary Outdoor Caucus: The secret group of MPs and Senators working to sabotage animal cruelty and wildlife protection legislation, a briefing paper by the Animal Protection Party of Canada
Image: Matthieu Godbout GFDL, via Wikimedia Commons
Have you ever wondered why almost every effort to modernize Canada’s antiquated animal protection laws has failed? Present laws date back to 1892 and nothing has changed. In their defence, the Conservative Party, under the leadership of the Right Hon. Stephen Harper, did increase fines for offenders. As for the Liberals, the last time they did anything The Right Hon. Louis Saint-Laurent was Prime Minister.
I’m compelled to wonder why the laws governing animal protection have failed to meet today’s changing expectations. Perhaps a paper released by the Animal Protection Party of Canada (APPC) could shed some light on the politics governing the issue of animal cruelty laws in this Country. The briefing is entitled The Parliamentary Outdoor Caucus: The secret group of MPs and Senators working to sabotage animal cruelty and wildlife protection legislation.
Have you ever wondered why almost every effort to modernize Canada’s antiquated animal protection laws has failed?
So what is the “raison d’être” of the Outdoor Caucus? One Canadian Shooting Sports article states: “The mission of the Parliamentary Outdoor Caucus (POC), is to entrench in law fishing, hunting, trapping and shooting sports as acceptable, traditional, environmentally-sustainable outdoor heritage activities with a safety credo and a conservation ethic as our highest priority.” I won’t challenge their interpretation of “environmentally sustainable” in the interest of my blood pressure, nor will I accept their use of “conservation ethic” when they really mean “conservation politicized”.
Secret Club
This clandestine, non-partisan, Parliamentary caucus has close ties with industry through the Outdoor Caucus Association of Canada (OCAC – lobbyists). The OCAC is chaired by an executive with Shimano, a major manufacturer of sport fishing equipment. Another article, this time in The Fishing Wire states: “The Outdoor Caucus Association of Canada (formed in 2006), serves as a liaison between the Canadian fishing, hunting trapping and recreational shooting community/related industry and non-partisan all party Parliamentary Outdoor Caucus (POC) in Ottawa”.
The problem here is that the Parliamentary Outdoor Caucus (POC), made up of Members of Parliament and Senators, should represent the interest of “all Canadians” and not only those from special interests. In fact, the overwhelming majority of Canadians, when asked by the Federal Government, do not see wildlife as a resource to be exploited. In short, outdoor heritage activities are enjoyed by all Canadians regardless of political persuasions and the people have a right/expectation, to be represented in a non-partisan and apolitical manner in Parliament.
Lobbyists and special interests
The OCAC actively lobbies Members of Parliament and Senators as they did on June 7, 2016, at the Stittsville Shooting Ranges just southwest of Ottawa. In cooperation with the Canadian Shooting Sports Association, they hosted an event for POC members and a few of their senior aids.
Image: courtesy of CAFT
Guests included the Hon. Rona Ambrose (Conservative), the Hon. Kellie Leitch (Conservative), Christine Moore (NDP), Gurdie Hutchings (Liberal), and the Hon. Peter Kent (Conservative). Approximately 123 MPs and Senators are members of the POC. Is your Member of Parliament included in this elite clandestine group? Other than the Caucus co-chairs, Yvonne Jones (Liberal MP, Labrador), and Bob Zimmer (Conservative MP, Prince George-Peace River), membership in POC is not made public. It is also to be noted that membership is voluntary and no membership list exists. According to Bob Zimmer, Chair of the POC, “This is by design. Many MPs want to be informed, but they don’t want their participation or attendance used against them politically”.
…outdoor heritage activities are enjoyed by all Canadians regardless of political persuasions and the people have a right/expectation, to be represented in a non-partisan and apolitical manner in Parliament.
The Parliamentary Outdoor Caucus is large and effective. Bob Zimmer says that POC came together and defeated Bill C-246 the most recent attempt to modernize the animal cruelty laws in this Country. Now I could go on citing examples of misinformation, the use of politically corrupted terminology and politicized conservation rhetoric, but that isn’t what this is about. My motivation is fuelled by the fact that unknown to the general public, elected representatives in this country, as well as non-elected members of the Senate, are back-rooming deals without the knowledge or consent of those who placed their confidence in them on voting day.
If you are at all concerned about animal cruelty in this country, then I urge you to ask your MP if he/she is in any way associated with the Parliamentary Outdoor Caucus (POC).
Feature image: William John Gauthier via StockPholio.net
Other articles by Georges R. Dupras
More recent articles from WestmountMag.ca
Georges R. Dupras has advocated for animals for over fifty years. A member of the International Association for Bear Research and Management (IBA) and a past Board member of the Canadian SPCA, he worked on the original Save the Seal campaign in 1966 that culminated in the foundation of the International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW) in 1969. Georges Dupras has published two books, Values in Conflict and the eBook Ethics, a Human Condition, and currently lives in Montreal, Canada.
Thank you George for exposing the truth about this elite organization. It’s truly frustrating to see why our federal justice system is in need of an overhaul and continually fails to protect animals. Perhaps, we need to start changing it on a provincial level….?
In Dec 2015, Animals in Quebec are now to be considered “sentient beings” instead of property under a bill tabled in the national assembly. While the bill did not include wild species, it’s a step in the right direction. Obviously, more work will be needed to change it, across Canada.
Excellent article Mr. Dupras. I had never heard of this group before. I’ll bring it to the attention of my MP.
I urge all readers to post a link to Mr. Dupras’ article on social media along with a link to this short video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zp3uhpOTfK0. We cannot allow an organization, made up solely of elected MPs and non-elected members of the Senate, that is so concerned with allowing their followers to practice blood sports that they vote down anti-cruelty bills. Bills that want to update the inadequate bill of 1892 that had just minor amendments in the mid-1950s. Unspeakable cruelty happens to so many animals and the perpetrators are not brought to justice. This must stop!”
The anti-cruelty laws must be broken down and separated.
Fishing, hunting and trapping in one section of its own, broken down by type.
Animals raised for food in a section, broken down by species, and each of the aspects that apply to each one.
Zoos.
Seals.
Whales and dolphins.
Dogs.
I won’t go further, I’m sure you get my point.
Hunters cannot hold power over the laws of the entire animal kingdom.